Chodzi mi o to że mogą istnieć w przyrodzie dwa nowe gatunki, nieznane nauce, a różniące się cechami umieszczonymi "na podwoziu".

73.1.4. Designation of an illustration of a single specimen as a holotype is to be treated as designation of the specimen illustrated; the fact that the specimen no longer exists or cannot be traced does not of itself invalidate the designation.

In short, Marshall and Evenhuis published a nomen nudum because their discovery is backed only by a photograph and not by a type specimen.

Marshall & Evenhuis’s (2015) statement that ‘collecting
specimens is highly desirable, but is indeed no longer required’
may have the equivalent effect of dropping an atomic bomb on
natural history museums.

In our opinion, Article 13.1 of the Code imposes serious restrictions on the practice
of describing of new species based on photographs. It establishes the following
requirements with regard to the availability of names for new taxa:
• 13.1. Requirements. To be available, every new name published after 1930 must
satisfy the provisions of Article 11 and must
• 13.1.1. be accompanied by a description or definition that states in words characters
that are purported to differentiate the taxon…

Accordingly, in some insect groups new species of insects clearly cannot be described
with only photographs. Species that are distinguished by structure of genitalia
are an obvious example. One may object that, after all, Article 13.1.1 does not mandate
that we use genitalia for differentiation of species. For further clarity we provide
the following hypothetical example.